Chuck McGrady
  • Welcome
  • About Chuck McGrady
  • General Assembly
    • NCGA Website
    • How Laws Are Made
    • Legislative Building
    • Our State Seal
    • State Constitution
    • Glossary of Terms
  • Maps
    • District 117 Map
    • House Districts Map
  • Links
    • State Agencies
    • State Website
    • Court System
    • Henderson County Links
      • County Government
      • City of Hendersonville
      • Henderson County Schools
      • Chamber of Commerce
      • County Board of Elections
      • Blue Ridge Humane Society
  • Contribute
1 Representative Chuck McGrady
15
18

The Start of the Legislative Session

Posted on February 12, 2019 by admin in Agriculture, Appropriations, Education, Environment, Ethics, Inside Baseball, Justice, McGrady, Newsletters, Spirituous Liquor, Transportation

Click to learn more about Representative Chuck McGradyStarting the legislative session is much like turning on a copy machine. You turn on the machine, and one isn’t immediately able to make copies. With the legislature, after everyone takes their oaths of office and receives their assigned seats on the floor, designated offices, and committee assignments, legislation doesn’t immediately get enacted. Bills have to be drafted, filed, heard in one or more committees and then come to the floor of either the House or the Senate. After passing one chamber, the bill must then pass the other chamber after some number of committee hearings. So, in our first week, only one bill will have run the gauntlet: Senate Bill 7 [Bipartisan Ethics Appointments], a bill to make certain appointments to the State Ethics Commission. The bill passed the Senate by a vote of 45-0, and passed the House by a vote of 116-1. The bill was noncontroversial and isn’t really a “law” since it just makes appointments on behalf of the Senate and House. It moved quickly because the appointments are needed to allow the commission to work due to restructuring of the commission that occurred in late 2018.

Some may remember how quickly things got going in 2011. Both the House and the Senate took up bills on their first full day in session. That was the year that Republicans claimed the majority. We ran on a common agenda and, since the majority had an agreed-upon agenda, bills were introduced on the day legislators were sworn in, and were heard in committees on day two and moved directly to the floor for a vote. That process hasn’t occurred since 2011, probably because legislators in the majority haven’t run on a common agenda since then. In 2011, Republicans signaled a change by moving quickly on bills that had clear majority support. If Democrats had retaken the majority in the last election, it is possible one would have seen similar quick action on some of their consensus bills.

Aside from SB7, the only other bill that passed the House this week was House Bill 16 [2019 House Permanent Rules]. Each chamber adopts its own rules, and this bill was essentially a reenactment of the rules adopted in the last session. A few changes were proposed by Democrats. For example, one member proposed there be no limit on the number of bills that could be filed by any member. A decade ago, there was no limit, but a limitation of 10 bills was set in 2011. Last session, that limit was increased to 15. The limit was put in place to focus legislators on what they deemed appropriate and avoid some amount of wasted staff time drafting bills that weren’t going to be heard. The limit of 15 bills does not include local bills, and it is relatively easy to borrow a bill from another member who isn’t going to use his or her 15-bill limit. When the bill limit was 10, I routinely borrowed bills from other members. With the cap at 15 during the last session, I didn’t hit my limit.

The Minority Leader Darren Jackson (D-Wake) proposed limiting the subject of conference reports only to such matters as are different between the two chambers and limiting the use of “floaters” in committees. Both these amendments failed on party-line votes. Conference reports are bills put together to reconcile differences between bills passed by each chamber in different forms. Under both the Democrats and the Republicans, conference reports sometimes include matters that weren’t addressed in either of the chambers’ bills and often legislators are surprised when some provision is added to a conference report that was not seen in a filed bill. When this happens, House Rules in recent years have required a committee hearing on the conferenced bill even though the bill can’t be amended in committee. So a member can slow down the process to make sure something new that is inserted in a bill at the last minute gets a committee hearing.

Floaters are members who can join a committee for purposes of creating a quorum or casting votes. When Democrats were in charge up until around 2005, the House Rules provided for “floaters,” and when Republicans took charge in 2011, they quickly learned that it was advantageous to have floaters to maintain their majority in committees when some of their members were missing or didn’t agree with each other.

I hate conference reports that include matters that were not in the original bills, although they are periodically needed to move “necessary” legislation. I also don’t like the idea of having “floaters” change the vote count in a committee when House leadership decides it favors some potential outcome in committee. Knowing that the amendments would fail on party line votes and that my vote wasn’t going to change anything, I did something I’ve rarely done. I stepped out of the House chamber and went back to my office to work on other matters. I’m not one to fight battles that I can’t win and aren’t significant. To be effective, one has to pick one’s battles. Ultimately, I voted for HB16 along with all of my Republican colleagues and 6 Democratic colleagues. The final vote was 70 to 43.

The most important thing that happened for most members in the past weeks was the announcement of their committee assignments. While my appointment as a full chair of the Appropriations Committee had been announced early in January, it was only a few days before the start of session that I learned my committee assignments:

  • Appropriations (Chairman)
  • Appropriations, Agriculture and Natural and Economic Resources (Vice Chairman)
  • Appropriations, Transportation (Vice Chairman)
  • Alcoholic Beverage Control (Chairman)
  • Environment  (Vice Chairman)
  • Agriculture (Member)
  • Education-Universities  (Member)
  • Judiciary  (Member)

Initially, I’d been left off the Judiciary and Transportation Committees, but I was added after the initial appointments were made. Essentially, I got every committee assignment that I wanted while some Republican Members had to give up some of their committee seats to accommodate the larger number of Democratic Members that were elected. Fortunately, I will still have a hand in subject areas important to my district.

The legislature’s pace will pick up in the coming weeks. Legislators will move from “process” to “substance” as bills get filed, heard by committees, and debated on the floor. One can expect to see the legislature pivot to issues ranging from criminal law to transportation policy to education policy to regulatory reform. The budget process will start, and the House takes the lead in this biennium. If things go well, we’ll be home by Independence Day. If things don’t go so well, who knows when we’ll be home.
Click here to learn more about Representative Chuck McGrady

Read More

House Enacts Voter ID With Veto Override

Posted on December 19, 2018 by admin in Election Reform, Elections

The state House of Representatives enacted voter ID into North Carolina law on Wednesday, implementing a ballot referendum approved by voters in November with the legislature’s twenty-first veto override of Governor Roy Cooper.

The veto override by the state House is the General Assembly’s final legislative action enacting voter ID into North Carolina law. It follows approval by the people of a proposed constitutional amendment to require photo ID at the polls in the November midterm election.

Governor Roy Cooper nonetheless rejected Senate Bill 824 [Implementation of Voter ID Const. Amendment] and called voter ID supporters “cynical” and “sinister” in a late-Friday afternoon veto message.

Though Gov. Cooper’s veto message said the voter ID bill “fails to fix” absentee ballot fraud, in-fact the legislation directly addresses ballot harvesting with an amendment to require voter ID for mail-in ballots that was proposed by a House Democrat and approved by a vote of 106-1.

Gov. Cooper’s veto message also said SB824 was “designed to suppress the rights” of voters, even though the bill allows any voter to assert a “reasonable impediment” at the polls for why they don’t have a qualifying ID.

The legislation further accommodates religious objectors, provides for free state-issued IDs, and accepts a broad range of qualifying IDs including student IDs, drivers’ licenses, passports, military and veteran IDs, voter and state employee cards, and Native American tribal cards. SB824 even allows drivers’ licenses from other states to qualify in some circumstances.

Speaker Tim Moore (R-Cleveland) has filed legislation proposing voter ID in North Carolina in every legislative term since first taking office in 2002.

“Delivering a voter ID law to North Carolinians who supported this simple yet essential election integrity measure on the ballot in November was a constitutional imperative,” Moore said.

“I’m proud of the commitment House lawmakers made to finish this accomplishment and keep our promise to the people of North Carolina who approved voter ID in our state constitution.”

Thirty-four other states have some form of voter ID law. North Carolina is the last state in the Southeast not to require some form of voter ID.

Rep. David Lewis (R-Harnett), a chairman of the House Committee on Elections and Ethics Law, noted Gov. Cooper’s voter ID veto was issued at 4:00 p.m. on a Friday “to bury his defiance in a news dump with inflammatory language to keep his political base on his side.”

“My district is full of good, hard-working, well-intentioned people – there is nothing sinister or cynical about them,” Lewis said. “The governor does not have a problem with this legislature, he has a problem with his citizens.”

“This bill does exactly what the people of this state wanted us to do.”

Read More

The End Is In Sight

Posted on December 13, 2018 by admin in Cooper, Elections, McGrady, Newsletters

Click to learn more about Representative Chuck McGrady

Just when it seemed the legislature might be around for another week of work followed by a veto override session, now legislators are heading home. The chambers passed the bills on their respective calendar, and legislators only have to wait to find out which, if any, bill will be vetoed. The Governor will receive the remaining bills today, and since the legislature technically remains in session, he’ll have ten days to act on the bills.

Both the Senate and the House passed the elections bill, HB1029 [Bipartisan State Board Changes], with broad bipartisan support. The Senate vote was 34-3, with all but one Democratic senator joining with the majority of Republican senators to pass the bill. In the House, majorities in both parties supported the bill, with the bill passing 81-18.

The bill moved forward quickly because legislative leaders used a transportation bill that was in a conference committee as the “vehicle” for moving the bill. Essentially, the election bill was substituted for the transportation bill, and then came to the floor of both chambers with full debate but no ability to amend the bill.

The bill summary outlines every provision in the bill. However, it is fair to say that the bill “returns the law to the 2016 structure for elections, ethics, and lobbying” with a few modifications. The former State Board of Elections is reestablished, with the Governor having control of those appointments. The former State Ethics Commission is also reestablished with an even split in its members as between the two parties. The Secretary of State again has authority over registrations and reporting by lobbyists and those that hire them.

Of local interest is a modification to the composition of county boards of election to consist of five persons, with four members appointed by the State Board of Elections and one member appointed by the Governor, with the Governor’s appointment serving as chair.

Responding to the apparent voter fraud involving Bladen and Robeson counties which may require a rerun of the election for the Ninth Congressional seat, the bill amends the procedure for voting an absentee ballot in the presence of two persons. It requires the voter to do one of the following: (1) have the application notarized or (2) have the two persons in whose presence the voter marked that voter’s ballot to certify that the voter is the registered voter submitting the marked ballot. The bill also provides that for any new congressional general election ordered, a primary must be conducted for that election. So in the Ninth District, if the State Board of Election orders a new election, the race may not be between the two candidates who ran in November—Mark Harris (R) and Dan McCready (D). The problems that may give rise to a new election may well have occurred in both the primary and the general elections, and the legislature changed current law to have a total re-run of the election—not just the general election.

One concern as we approached the end of the session was that we’d take up SB821 [Sunset Unconstitutional Boards & Commissions], a bill that mirrored a provision in HB1117 [Restructure Election Admin/Ethics/Lobbying/CF] that would have sunsetted a number of boards and commissions that were found to have been unconstitutionally constituted since the Governor did not have the majority of appointments to each board. What became clear was that, even if SB821 passed the House, it didn’t have enough support to withstand a veto. In fact, it appeared the bill would fail in the House. Rather, than waste time on that debate, House leadership—meaning Speaker Moore—pulled the bill.

When we come back next year, I will reintroduce my bill on the same subject, HB1120 [Reconstitute Boards and Commissions], that will would solve the problems with these boards. The Clean Water Management Trust Fund, the Parks & Recreation Trust Fund, the Child Care Board, as well as the other boards and commissions functioned just fine, and there is an easy fix for each of these boards.

My special thanks go to lobbyists for the NC chapters of The Nature Conservancy and the Audubon Society as well as Friends of the State Parks. They helped mobilize opposition to the sunset bill. Child serving organizations also helped, and numerous local government officials spoke to their legislators about why these boards and commissions needed to be reconstituted. It is easy to get jaded about the legislative process, but this is the latest example of people’s opinions affecting the outcome of a legislative debate.

The last matter to be taken up was a technical corrections bill, SB469 [Technical Corrections]. Since this was the last bill to pass, various legislators in both chambers tried to add their favorite provisions to the bill, and it was not clear that any bill would actually move forward. After extensive negotiations, the bill passed 57-35 in the House and 19-8 in the Senate, largely along party lines. My sense was that Democrats didn’t like a municipal charter school technical provision and a stormwater provision. I was not excited about either of these provisions but, having kept some number of provisions out of the bill, felt like I needed to compromise and support the bill.

Ultimately, the bill that was put forward was short on new policy and was mostly real, technical corrections. While I had nothing I was trying to get into the bill, I worked hard to keep some provisions relating to environmental protection and similar matters from being added to the bill. My view is that if we want to change policy then we should do it in the light of day with a review in a committee. Sneaking a provision in a technical corrections bill that is not subject to amendment is not right. As I leave Raleigh, I’m happy that I helped block some policy changes that weren’t fully vetted.

Legislators head home expecting that they will be back for one more day to vote on any vetoes issued by Governor Cooper. The expectation is that he will veto the Voter ID bill, SB824 [Implementation of Voter ID Const. Amendment], but he may allow the elections bill to become law. I understand that the Governor opposes one provision in the technical corrections bill related to municipal charter schools, but I wonder whether he’ll veto that bill because of his objection to one provision. Of course, the bill has changed, and he may have other objections to it. Guess we’ll have to wait and see.
Click here to learn more about Representative Chuck McGrady

Read More

The Endless Legislative Session

Posted on December 12, 2018 by admin in Children, Cooper, Disaster Relief, Elections, Emergency Management, Environment, McGrady, Newsletters, Recreation

Click to learn more about Representative Chuck McGrady

When the legislature adjourned its “Short Session” in late June, it didn’t adjourn for the year. Rather, it adjourned until November 27th. At the time, the thought was, if one or more of the constitutional amendments on the November ballot passed, the legislature might need to pass implementing legislation. For example, voters could approve the Voter ID amendment, but the legislature would need to define what type of voter identification would be accepted. Well, the amendment passed, so we came back to consider Voter ID legislation.

The adjournment resolution, however, set no limits on what matters could be taken up during the November session. So almost any matter can be brought up for consideration during the session, giving rise to concerns that a lame duck legislature could take up major legislation during its end-of-the-year session. Since Republicans lost their veto-proof majority in the November elections, the concern is that Republicans in the majority in both chambers will pass legislation that Governor Cooper would veto, but the veto would be overridden. However, if that same legislation passed next year, and Governor Cooper vetoed it, his veto might hold since Democrats will have enough votes to keep the veto from being overridden.

So far, the session has proceeded with few fireworks. The Senate and House passed a Voter ID bill, SB824 [Implementation of Voter ID Const. Amendment], that implements the constitutional requirement that voters offering to vote in person provide a photographic identification before voting. The bill provides that any of the following is a valid ID: A North Carolina driver’s license, a non-driver identification card issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles without charge, an identification card issued by a county board of election, a U.S. passport, college student IDs, military and veteran IDs, and tribal enrollment cards.

The debate over the bill primarily focused on what types of IDs should be acceptable. Democrats mostly argued that there were other IDs that ought to be permissible, such as high school IDs or employer-issued IDs. Republicans argued the bill already provided a broad range of acceptable IDs and that IDs that were not government-issued should not be allowed. Some Republicans actually thought the bill was too liberal in its definition of acceptable IDs. Their particular concern was the use of IDs issued by colleges and community colleges. They felt that students coming from out-of-state shouldn’t be able to use school-issued IDs, since it allowed students to vote when they probably were still using the driver’s licenses issued by other states.

The Senate bill was amended in the House to require the State Board of Elections to implement rules for verifying absentee ballots in a more secure manner consistent with in-person photo ID requirements. This provision was clearly the result of the apparent fraud involving absentee ballots in Robeson and Bladen counties.

The bill passed the Senate on a 31-11 vote which was largely along party lines with all Republican senators joined by three Democratic senators voting for passage. Similarly, the House passed the bill by a vote of 67-40, with two Democratic House Members joining all but one Republican in supporting the bill.

What surprised me was how few communications I received from constituents about Voter ID. What I did receive mostly came from constituents who had previously contacted me to oppose the Voter ID amendment, but now want the legislature be very liberal in determining what IDs should be accepted. Medicaid cards (which aren’t photo IDS), high school IDs, and employer-issued IDs were among the suggestions; none of those suggestions are in the bill. Recognizing that obtaining photo IDs from a local DMV office can be difficult, the House provided monies for county boards of election to issue photo IDs.

In contrast to the Voter ID bill, the disaster relief bill, SB823 [Hurricane Florence/Supplemental Act], passed unanimously in both chambers. It provided an appropriation of almost $300 million for additional Hurricane Florence disaster relief. In mid-October, the legislature passed two bills allocating over $850 million for Florence-related disaster relief. The largest appropriation of $240 million went to provide grants to farmers for crop losses. Other large appropriations included $25 million for repair and renovation of school facilities, $5 million for loans to small businesses, $10 million for commercial fishing assistance, and $18.75 million for mitigation and cleanup of coastal storm damages to ocean beaches, dunes and shorelines. Thus far, my primary focus in this session has been on disaster relief since I authored most of the legislation related to Hurricane Matthew.

The last major bill taken up by the House was SB469 [Technical Corrections]. In theory, a technical corrections bill should only contain corrections to earlier legislation, typically clarifying earlier legislation or changing dates or correcting cross-references to other legislation. In actuality, technical corrections bills often attract substantive changes to earlier legislation or even totally new provisions.

Looking towards this week, the issues that need to be addressed are issues involving the State Board of Elections and Ethics. The legislature has made several attempts to restructure that board, but those attempts have been successfully challenged in the courts. The latest effort to restructure the State Board is HB1117 [Restructure Election Admin/Ethics/Lobbying/CF], which would split the agency putting its functions under the oversight of two boards. One board controlled by the governor would handle elections. The five person board would be appointed by the governor—three from his party and two from the other party. A second eight person board would handle ethics, campaign finance and lobbying with the appointments equally split between the governor and legislative leaders.

With the focus being on Voter ID and disaster relief, election-related legislation has not begun to move through the committees or either chamber, but a court-imposed deadline to take action probably means that the bill or other bills on the same topic will move next week.

One section of HB1117 sunsets six boards or commissions, effective on June 30, that were determined to be unconstitutionally constituted in Cooper v. Berger. The Clean Water Management Trust Fund board, the Parks & Recreation Trust Fund board, and the Child Care Commission were among the boards that would be sunsetted. The reason given for sunsetting the boards was that they were found to be unconstitutional and the statutory references should be removed.

The real reason for sunsetting the boards and commissions is to create a disincentive for Governor Cooper to challenge the composition of other similarly constituted boards and commissions. Moreover, the perspective was that the Governor had a great interest in the boards and commissions being reconstituted consistent with the court decision and by sunsetting the boards and commissions Republicans gained leverage in negotiations on this and other issues.

My view is that we should simply reconstitute the boards and commissions, consistent with the court decision, and I filed a bill to do just that, HB1120 [Reconstitute Various Boards & Commissions]. There is no one saying that these boards and commissions weren’t functioning, and I think we shouldn’t be playing politics with boards and commissions that are actually doing their jobs. By executive order Governor Cooper reconstituted the boards and commissions, and he reappointed all of the board or commission members appointed by the legislature except those that would be expiring soon. My pitch to my colleagues is not to play politics with programs that are working.

The Clean Water Management Trust Fund was the primary funder when the DuPont State Recreational Forest was acquired. It also funded Fletcher’s park and helped Conserving Carolina, the local land trust, on a wide range of projects. Similarly, the Parks & Recreation Trust Fund has helped fund most of our towns and cities parks. I’ve heard from constituents about the important work done by the Child Care Board.

The assumption is that Governor Cooper may veto one or more of the bills passed by the legislature — maybe the Voter ID bill, the technical corrections bill, the elections board bill, or the boards and commissions bill. For that reason, when the legislature goes home this week, it will technically stay in session to force the Governor to take action in ten days. That will allow the legislature to come back and consider overriding any vetoes.Click here to learn more about Representative Chuck McGrady

Read More

$793 Million for Florence Recovery

Posted on October 16, 2018 by admin in Disaster Relief

State lawmakers yesterday allocated $793 million in additional Hurricane Florence relief funding in response to the preliminary needs assessment released last week, bringing the legislature’s total commitment to disaster recovery since the storm to $850 million. For comparison, after Hurricane Matthew, the legislature appropriated $200 million two months after the storm. With this latest action, the North Carolina General Assembly has allocated over $1.2 billion for hurricane recovery since 2016.

Representative McGrady is a primary sponsor of the legislation.

The Hurricane Florence Disaster Recovery Fund (HFDRF) appropriates $65 million to provide a state match for federal disaster assistance and another $65 million state match for federal transportation assistance. It spends $60 million on capital recovery funds for public school facilities and $30 million for capital needs in the University of North Carolina system. Another $28 million will benefit local governments, while agriculture recovery received $50 million. More than $30 million was directed to housing recovery support.

Tens of millions more dollars will meet needs in behavioral health, community hospitals, small businesses, community colleges, and mosquito abatement efforts in areas of North Carolina affected by Hurricane Florence. Funding for coastal beach renourishment, dredging needs, marine debris cleanup, and commercial fishermen were also included in the recovery package.

The measure includes a fix for members of the National Guard who participated in the response to Hurricane Matthew. The bill waives outstanding debt service members owed due to accidental overpayments by the Department of Public Safety (DPS). It also requires DPS to reimburse service members who already repaid the department.

As part of the continuing collaboration among state leaders to respond to the historic storm, officials from the Office of State Budget and Management (OSBM), including State Budget Director Charles Perusse, briefed key appropriations leaders and fiscal staff in the North Carolina legislature on Thursday. Participants discussed the Governor’s proposal at length in a productive working session.

OSBM told lawmakers that, consistent with the descriptions contained in the Governor’s report, the needs assessment released this week was a preliminary figure that may change based on further analysis and the availability of additional federal aid. OSBM also said that this is a long-term, five-year plan.

The report indicated that more concrete, on-the-ground data will soon be available to update the preliminary needs assessment, which relied in part on computer modeling. As such, some assessed needs may shift considerably over time as federal aid becomes clearer and damage assessments continue. Education needs, for example, are particularly preliminary, and many of the damage assessments will change in OSBM’s final report, lawmakers and staff heard from administration officials.

OSBM is also working on an estimate of how much funding could be spent in the next six months. They indicated that course corrections may be required over time. Based on this information and the Governor’s report, the legislature appropriated a majority of the funding immediately while preserving maximum flexibility to meet the final needs assessments that are currently ongoing.

Most of the funding transfer comes from the state’s record $2 billion rainy day fund.

In a joint statement, state House Speaker Tim Moore (R-Cleveland) and Senate Leader Phil Berger (R-Rockingham) said, “Since Hurricane Florence hit, we’ve sought to take politics out of the relief effort. Today’s historic, bipartisan aid package is yet another step in a collaborative recovery process that we hope will continue.”

State lawmakers convened in Raleigh on Monday for the second time in as many weeks, and are scheduled to go into session again in November. The legislature plans to continue collaborating with state agencies as they finalize their needs assessments for Hurricane Florence.

According to the most recent report on Hurricane Matthew funding, approximately $124 million has been disbursed, $115 million has been awarded, and $121 million remains available out of the total $360 million allocated in prior disaster recovery packages since 2016.

Read More
123›»

Contact

EmailFacebookTwitter

Search

Latest Newsletter

  • Great Seal of the State of North Carolina

    The Start of the Legislative Session

    February 12, 2019

More About Newsletters

To receive Rep. McGrady's newsletters, please send an email to his Legislative Assistant and we'll add you to our newsletter distribution list.

For a complete archive of all of Rep. McGrady's newsletters, click here.

Rep. McGrady’s Latest Tweets

  • Many thanks & congratulations to my fellow honorees: Miranda Brown, Joe Nicol, Scott Meltzer, Senator @DanBlueNC, S… https://t.co/rKqKWrSCNm
    February 19, 2019
  • But if @SanctuaryBeer was in another jurisdiction, it might be shut down by either ALE or the local public health a… https://t.co/KOcocNZ1AP
    February 19, 2019
  • @BeerLawCenter Another thing I guess I’ll have to consider resolving although I would hope the ABC board could reso… https://t.co/dQD4SkDXFa
    February 19, 2019
  • State law shouldn’t leave it unclear. There are dogs in breweries in Henderson County but I’ve heard Mecklenburg C… https://t.co/Njs6nEQB1G
    February 18, 2019
  • I’ve learned after being married for so long that being half-right about anything is about the best I can hope for.… https://t.co/u0mMgYz25r
    February 18, 2019
  • Stories and photos we love: For veterans in Henderson, a handmade gift for their service https://t.co/YvvZlVMEiR… https://t.co/wzYbve47Cx
    February 17, 2019
  • That is H 69–not H 60.
    February 15, 2019
  • The commission bill (H 60) gives us a chance to end partisan gerrymandering. Another way to do this is by consti… https://t.co/M1PA5CYL8J
    February 15, 2019
  • @amyrbrown12_amy @nutgraham While I agree with you, putting together a little, lame poetry to try to get folks thin… https://t.co/plGRY1sxYH
    February 14, 2019
  • Before the 50th Anniversary celebration for @FallingCreek, I went on the website and saw @BrianTurnerNC’s picture.… https://t.co/2lxtn6wR2g
    February 14, 2019

The Economy Then and Now

Articles by Category

Articles by Year

Recent Articles

  • The Start of the Legislative Session
  • House Enacts Voter ID With Veto Override
  • The End Is In Sight
  • The Endless Legislative Session
  • $793 Million for Florence Recovery
  • My Perspective on the Proposed Constitutional Amendments
  • Disaster Relief: What Comes Next
  • Hurricane Recovery Fund Approved in Bipartisan Vote
  • Legislature to Convene October 2 for Hurricane Relief
  • The WLOS Election Questionnaire
  • Constitutional Amendment Redux
  • State Revenues Exceed Forecast by Over $400 million
  • Hurricane Relief Committee to Investigate Recovery Delays
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
  • Revenue estimates $252.8 million ahead of targets
  • The Short Session Winds Down
  • Flag Day 2018
  • Remembering the Day that Saved the World
  • Houses Passes School Safety Programs
  • The Budget Passes and…Life After the Budget
  • The Budget: More Detail on What It Funds
  • The Budget: Substance and Process
  • A Primer on Transportation Projects
  • Six statistics Carolinians should know
  • Employment Increases by more than 85,000
  • Safeguarding Emergency Equipment
  • LEO: No Need to Get Angry
  • The Pharmacy Patient Fair Practices Act
  • A Statue for North Carolina’s Favorite Son
  • A Good and Faithful Servant
  • Remembering Washington on President’s Day
  • A New Pipeline of Money to Public Schools
  • Get Outta My Dreams, Get Into My Car
  • Tax Fraud Prevention Saves State Revenue
  • Class Size: A Simple Explanation of the Issue

Featured Video

Friends of Carl Sandburg at Connemara
This site is provided as a service to the people of Henderson County. It is not maintained at taxpayer expense.